Archive for the ‘Libraries/Info Sci’ Category

With my recent excursion into distance learning, I’ve had to re-evaluate my concept of what service means.

The student population we serve is entirely online - More than 99% of them will never set foot in the physical library. So by absolute necessity, our website becomes the primary point of service. We can’t count on even the limited face time with library staff that on campus students get. Let’s assume for a minute that our website is competently designed to get students to the resources they need. (And I like to think ours is.) Clear navigation, explanations, tutorials, etc. Most students will be able to find what they need on their own. We’ll never even see them at the reference desk to point out where the bathroom is. Of course, some of these students will still need help with the search process itself. They contact us by e-mail or phone, and this service is essentially the same as we provide to on-campus students. But most “overhead” type student questions disappear (ones like “where are your computers?”, “What resources do you have on topic X?” etc).

But after that winnowing, a new type of question rises to fill the gap. For lack of a better term, I’ll call them infrastructure questions. Most common is simple requests for forgotten passwords. Next is questions related to what exactly our distance learning site’s address is - one of our current major hurdles is to communicate better with online professors, and make sure they are giving correct instructions to access the resources. And thirdly, we get a large volume of phone calls from students who have virtually no experience with computers. These questions often become more like tech support calls than anything else. There are issues with proxies, firewalls, internet security software, spyware, viruses, browser updates, cookie settings, and any number of other things to take into account. Sometimes it even boils down to basic keyboard and mouse use. And while we do our best, the most frustrating end to a call is when there is literally nothing we can do to help a student. If they’re at work or on a military base, very often their network simply will not work with our proxy for the databases.

Some of this can probably be applied to traditional reference work as well: build a solid infrastructure for your resources, and many difficulties for users disappear. But with traditional service, there’s almost always a fallback option: the user can come to the library and sit down with a librarian for face to face help. With a phone conversation, and even with online tools to help, that experience can’t quite be replicated for our online students. For example, sometimes it turns out that my instructions weren’t clear to the student. Sitting next to them, I would have spotted the disconnect between us immediately. But over the phone, it may take a very confusing five or ten minutes to get back on track.

Suddenly, infrastructure becomes a more critical element of service. My new goal is to improve our website and online guides so that as many as possible of these confusing conversations can be avoided.

Changes

March 6th, 2007 2 Comments

Over at The Liminal Librarian, Rachel has a great post about “Making Our Careers Happen”. She highlights one thing that I really love about being a librarian: we have the power to make things happen in any number of areas. My job has had a remarkable amount of flexibility, letting me get experience in a number of areas: reference desk hours, instruction, systems work, and any number of special projects. Starting next monday, I’ve found a new hat to wear: distance learning.

At UAH we provide library services to Kaplan University, a mostly online school with over 20,000 students (and quickly growing! In 2001 they had just 34). We manage their database subscriptions, provide reference service, set up course reserves, and deliver articles and books to students worldwide. I’ll be stepping in and supervising the department - at first on a short term basis, keeping an eye on how to restructure my role and the whole department in the future. I’m really, really excited about this opportunity! I’ve spent the last two weeks intensively observing and training in the department (causing my online disappearance), and really like what I see. It’s been exhausting, but I still feel genuinely motivated. Distance learning is pretty cutting edge stuff, and the chance to work on emerging services and technologies like this is something I’ve always wanted. On a smaller level, the stories of distance learning students continually amaze me. Today a call came in from a student deployed in Iraq, and I’ve heard about others in the most remote parts of Alaska or central Asia.

I can’t say that I truly made this opportunity happen - to be honest it actually fell in my lap. But I still feel that the skills I’ve cultivated in myself over the years have led to this point like an arrow. Will I stay in distance learning long term? Who knows? But now that I’ve gotten my feet wet in a number of areas, I’m ready to focus in on just one for a bit. I’m nervous, but also excited. And the latter outweighs the former.

With the ability to make our careers happen comes a responsibility to learn to roll with change as it comes - made by us or not. Take the skills learned from change and mash them into your career direction. That’s the biggest lesson I’ve learned in my year and a half since grad school.

It runs in the family

January 18th, 2007 2 Comments

I started working at the Fairport Public Library when I was 15, shelving books. I eventually worked my way up to a part time clerk during college.

My brother also shelved books there in high school.

My mom is an elementary school librarian.

My dad took a position this winter on the Board of Trustees at FPL.

So now my entire immediate family has worked in a library, and three of us at the same one.

Anyone want to do a study on whether genetics can predispose someone into the field? :)

Extraneous data

January 14th, 2007 1 Comment

I have a an odd fascination with pointless data that will never be of real use to me in daily life. Here’s a few links in that spirit:

Enter in a tracking number from any service - UPS, USPS, FedEX, or DHL - to PackageMapping.com and this site does a whole suite of processing on the tracking information. You can view the raw timestamps just like on each carrier’s official site, as well as view a map of progress, an RSS feed or email notifications, a grand total transit time, and a calculated average speed of your delivery. My recent order from Barnes & Noble made it here in 48 hours and 45 minutes, with an average speed of 61.52mph. A lot of these features (especially the RSS feed) really should be provided by the shippers themselves. But until they do, this works nicely.

I recently received a “bag of crap” from woot.com. Periodically they sell a random pile of items for $1 under that name. My package included a Thermohawk 200 no touch thermometer. It measures the infrared radiation coming off an object, instead of the more traditional air or interior temperature. So, for example, my microwaved pizza was 118 degrees. My laptop’s screen is running at 86 degrees. By and large it seems pretty accurate compared to my more traditional thermometer, but I’m a bit concerned that my forehead measures as 91.5F… Of course, I have no practical use for the thing, but for $1? Not too shabby.

360voice.com has a fun gimmick - it monitors the progress of your Xbox Live gamer profile, and automatically updates a blog as if it was written by your console. You can see what my Xbox thinks of me here.

That’s all for now!

As December comes to a close, the web once again gets swarmed with “year’s best” or “most popular” lists. I’ll probably be writing my own annual wrapup post in the near future. Today and yesterday I spent some time looking at Google and Yahoo’s top ten search terms for the year:

Google’s “Top Searches in 2006″ (source):

  1. bebo
  2. myspace
  3. world cup
  4. metacafe
  5. radioblog
  6. wikipedia
  7. video
  8. rebelde
  9. mininova
  10. wiki

Yahoo’s “Top 10 Overall Searches” (source):

  1. Britney Spears
  2. WWE
  3. Shakira
  4. Jessica Simpson
  5. Paris Hilton
  6. American Idol
  7. Beyonce Knowles
  8. Chris Brown
  9. Pamela Anderson
  10. Lindsay Lohan

Now, something obviously doesn’t add up here. There’s no way Google’s and Yahoo’s user bases can be that different.

I started looking into just how each search engine calculates and chooses their top results. Google somewhat vaguely states that “To compile these year-end lists and graphs, we reviewed a variety of the most popular search terms that people typed into Google.”

Looking for more specifics, I ran across this interview with a Google VP. It turns out that the top ten is not based on simple popularity. Instead, it is based on ranking the quickest gainers in popularity. This explains why Bebo is ranked higher than Myspace. As a newcomer relative to Myspace, Bebo had more room to grow. If searches for Bebo went from nothing to a huge level this year, that’s a larger change than Myspace going from an already huge to slightly more huge level. And if searches for pornography and other net vices have leveled off, they won’t make the list either no matter how huge their numbers are. The only terms censored from Google’s list are their own product names.

This computer-generated list contrasts sharply with Yahoo’s policy of heavily editing and paring down their list. Based on reading the FAQ about Yahoo’s ‘Buzz’ rankings, the ranking process seems to follow Google’s pretty closely - the list is based on the largest increase, not simple numbers of searches. What’s more revealing is the list of what’s left out: “Company names (such as Yahoo!), utilities and formats (email, MP3), and general terms (movies, downloads, football)…” This alone explains most of the differences between the two companies’ lists - seven of Google’s ten qualify as company names.

Also, “The editors’ goal is to list subjects that are interesting to the broadest possible audience.” It’s hard to be sure, but I’d imagine the real world interpretation of that statement means the focus is on the entertainment world and the listed celebrities.

So what’s really the most-used search term of the year? Of the two lists, I think Google comes closer to answering the question. But there’s a third option: While I couldn’t dig this deeply into AOL’s search rankings, as they provide no background to the selection process, their top ten list rings a little more true to me. ‘Weather’ is number one, and the rest of the list is mostly generic terms like ‘games’ or ‘lyrics’. Not everyone is a power user, after all. But again, how this list was chosen is a mystery. Ultimately, without access to annual raw data the ‘real’ number one term probably can’t be known.

And there are probably a million ways of defining how the ‘real’ one should be calculated anyway. These lists are still useful in trend spotting, just take them with a grain of salt.

Time magazine has decided that each of us is worthy of the Person of the Year award - thanks to the rise of user generated content on the web (and I am of course putting this on my resume :-)).

Read the full article here. I think the ending bit is particularly illuminating:

Sure, it’s a mistake to romanticize all this any more than is strictly necessary. Web 2.0 harnesses the stupidity of crowds as well as its wisdom. Some of the comments on YouTube make you weep for the future of humanity just for the spelling alone, never mind the obscenity and the naked hatred.

But that’s what makes all this interesting. Web 2.0 is a massive social experiment, and like any experiment worth trying, it could fail. […] This is an opportunity to build a new kind of international understanding, not politician to politician, great man to great man, but citizen to citizen, person to person. It’s a chance for people to look at a computer screen and really, genuinely wonder who’s out there looking back at them. Go on. Tell us you’re not just a little bit curious.

Symposium Wrapup

December 3rd, 2006 No Comments

I’ve been pretty quiet here as of late, but am in the process of making a ton of posts over at the UAH Symposium blog. Our “E-Info Global” symposium wrapped up on Friday, and early indications are that it went very well! I know I personally enjoyed listening to every speaker, and had some great conversations with other attendees during the breaks. By the end of today I hope to have the rest of the speaker summaries posted.

It was fascinating to see this symposium come together from behind the scenes. I now have a much deeper appreciation for those who plan conferences!

We’re thinking about doing it again next year, so keep an eye out!

To LITA!

October 26th, 2006 No Comments

I leave in the morning for LITA Forum in Nashville! I’m looking forward to the conference, and will be blogging events as usual. I’m not sure of the status of internet access at the hotel, so posts may not appear until I’m back. But I’ll be blogging both here and over at the official LITA blog.

This is turning out to be an extremely busy couple of weeks for me, so sadly customizing the site’s new theme is going to have to wait. But I have a feeling most people who read this are doing it through an RSS reader of some kind anyway, so it’s not like you even notice :-P

Is there an agreed on tag for this conference? I’ll be going with LITAforum06 unless another one seems to be prevalent. And as usual, pictures will show up in my flickr account.

IE7 - Test Now!

October 15th, 2006 1 Comment

Internet Explorer 7’s release could be sprung on us any day now. As part of creating browser tools at work, I’ve had it installed for a few weeks now and overall like what I see. There’s tabbed browsing, nice handling of RSS feeds, etc. I have a few complaints about changes to the interface (in particular the decision to hide the traditional File, Edit, etc menus). But I’m not writing a full review.

I mostly wanted to post as a reminder to test your sites in IE7 prior to the official release. Most sites display correctly, but much to my dismay I’ve discovered that my own does not. It looks fine in Firefox and IE6, but not IE7 for some reason. The css formatting of my header doesn’t seem to be applied correctly. Thankfully I have a bit of time to fix things before IE7 gets pushed to all XP users. But I have a feeling some web designers might be caught off guard. Download it here.

(I’m also annoyed that now I’ll have to develop web sites and test for three browsers for the forseeable future - Firefox, IE6 and IE7)

This has been my pet project for the last few weeks:

Browser tools!

As the name implies, I pulled together a number of browser-based search options for our resources. So far we’ve got: Firefox search bar plugins (for that search box in the upper right corner) for the catalog and Academic Search Premier, IE7 search bar plugins for the same two resources, and a full fledged Firefox toolbar with a number of campus-related links and search options.

It isn’t quite live to the public yet - I want to increase the list of search bar plugins available, and I’m still toying with a couple of options for an IE toolbar.

They probably won’t be much good to anyone not affiliated with UAH, as everything gets routed through our proxy, but I’m just proud of the results and wanted to share :)

Here’s some stuff I learned in the process:

  1. Firefox toolbars are really easy to hand code - it’s just XML and javascript, and mostly takes a bit of trial and error. This tutorial was very helpful.
  2. IE toolbars are unfortunately much more complicated - the programming involved is beyond my level of expertise, at least for something to be done in my spare time at work. I’m looking at toolbar generators like www.conduit.com instead, which a lot of other libraries have used.
  3. Firefox search bar plugins are pretty simple to look at once created, but if the url for a database or catalog is complicated, creating it is a bit of a headache your first time.
  4. IE7’s search bar plugins conform to the Opensearch standard, and are ridiculously easy to code. Each one is a simple XML file - the part that took me the longest was figuring out that XML doesn’t like raw ampersands in the content.
  5. I’ve starded using these tools in my day to day work, and the number of clicks and page loads I’ve cut down on is amazing.

Mostly, I just hope someone else finds them useful. I learned a lot in the process of creating these tools, and look forward to expanding our list.